The discussion continues to evolve at an almost unstoppable pace. The wave of thought that was initially centered on sor panels has now spread to almost all aspects around it, such as: energy, economics, and global policy.

  What's interesting? @Only_James interventions are getting fewer and fewer. After expining the basic principles, he had almost nothing more to say.

  Scientists, engineers, economists and policy analysts are already busy with their own conversations.

  User Everett, who had previously questioned the resistance of the fossil fuel industry, now began arguing with user Vincent about tax incentive strategies to accelerate the energy transition.

  "If the government heavily subsidizes sor panels, then the economy can be pushed towards renewable energy faster," Vincent wrote.

  Everett disagrees, "@Vincent. But it could create an economic bubble. If the industry expands too fast without a stable foundation, we could have a crash like what happened in the tech sector a few decades ago."

  On the other hand, user Hana, a materials engineer, was still busy discussing the stability of perovskite with user Hiroshi, an applied energy specialist.

  "I'm not sure the protective polymers that @Only_James mentioned can be effective enough in the long run," Hana said, then continued, "If we can't stabilize the perovskite structure without losing its efficiency, then this material will just be a b experiment that never goes into mass production."

  Hiroshi replied quickly, "@Hana. But we can combine it with a silica-based sandwich structure to reduce heat-induced degradation. If we can't stabilize the perovskite directly, we have to modify the environment it works in."

  Meanwhile, economists who had previously focused only on the energy transition began to pull the discussion in a broader direction.

  The user named Marcel and the user named Eleanor no longer talked only about energy, but began to analyze the impact of changes in the energy system on the global economic structure.

  "@Eleanor if sor energy becomes more dominant, does that mean countries with fossil fuel export dependency will experience economic stagnation?" Marcel asked.

  Eleanor replied, "@Marcel. That is very possible. Countries as we know, whose economies are based on oil and gas exports, can experience significant economic dislocation. But on the other hand, they also have enough resources to invest in new energy technologies. The question is, are they willing to adapt before it is too te?"

  Vincent, who was originally talking about energy subsidies, jumped into the conversation, "If these changes are too rapid, we could also see a major impact on the financial sector. A sudden drop in energy commodity prices could cause global economic instability. Our financial system is not built to deal with sudden transitions like this."

  And amidst all this, @Only_James only occasionally responds. His comments are short, direct, and only to confirm facts or clear up minor misunderstandings.

  User named Haruto: "This theory is interesting, but I still doubt whether the smart grid system can be implemented on a rge scale without experiencing severe distribution disruptions. What do you think, @Only_James?"

  Only James: "@Haruto. In an ideal model, smart grid integration could reduce grid load rather than increase it. However, without an efficient energy management system, there is indeed a possibility of distribution disruptions. That's why research in load prediction algorithms and power flow mapping are very important factors."

  User named Maria: "If this really works, does that mean the traditional energy industry will completely disappear?"

  Only James: "@Maria. Not anytime soon. Traditional energy industries still have a role to py in stabilizing the global power grid. However, in the long run, the transition to renewables will see their role diminish, not disappear completely."

  This discussion went almost unchecked. They were no longer talking to @Only_James, but to fellow colleagues in their respective fields.

  Scientists debate the limits of technical and material innovation, economists question the systemic impact on the global economy, public policy analysts try to imagine a world sustained by a different energy system.

  And it all... Started with one simple post.One post from an anonymous account, that no one knew who was behind it. Except @Only_James himself.

  Time passes without anyone realizing it....

  This discussion is no longer just a scientific conversation. Like a tree branch that continues to grow in all directions, the discussion has now touched on almost all aspects that may be affected by the sor energy transition.

  Not just physics, not just economics: but also political policies, industrial dynamics, even the social implications for society.

  User named Aldrich: "@Only_James. In theory, this sounds interesting. But we all know that the world doesn't work on theory alone. How do you deal with the fact that the conventional energy industry is controlled by a handful of people who have too much political and economic influence?"

  Only James: "@Aldrich. Resistance from the conventional energy industry is inevitable. They have huge investments in existing infrastructure, and sudden changes could cost them dearly. However, there are two scenarios that can happen. They either adapt and start investing in renewable energy technologies, or they hold on too long and end up being disrupted by the market. History has shown that no industry is immortal if it does not adapt."

  That answer immediately sparked a new debate.

  User named Sung: "But don't forget that they have a stronger political lobby than green energy scientists or business people. Even if the technology is ready, they could derail its implementation through regution and policy pressure."

  User named Iliana: "@Sung. Not entirely true. There are precedents where regutions made to support old industries end up colpsing due to economic and public pressure. If renewables become cheaper and more efficient, it will be hard for them to hold back for too long."

  Meanwhile, the discussion continued to expand to other aspects that more directly touched the wider community.

  User named Elias: "@Only_James. All this sounds good from the perspective of scientists and economists. But what about ordinary people? If sor energy does repce conventional energy, what impact will it have on employment?"

  User named Aldrich: "@Only_James. In theory, this sounds interesting. But we all know that the world doesn't work on theory alone. How do you deal with the fact that the conventional energy industry is controlled by a handful of people who have too much political and economic influence?"

  Only James: "@Aldrich. Resistance from the conventional energy industry is inevitable. They have huge investments in existing infrastructure, and sudden changes could cost them dearly. However, there are two scenarios that can happen. They either adapt and start investing in renewable energy technologies, or they hold on too long and end up being disrupted by the market. History has shown that no industry is immortal if it does not adapt."

  That answer immediately sparked a new debate.

  User named Sung: "But don't forget that they have a stronger political lobby than green energy scientists or business people. Even if the technology is ready, they could derail its implementation through regution and policy pressure."

  User named Iliana: "@Sung. Not entirely true. There are precedents where regutions made to support old industries end up colpsing due to economic and public pressure. If renewables become cheaper and more efficient, it will be hard for them to hold back for too long."

  Meanwhile, the discussion continued to expand to other aspects that more directly touched the wider community.

  User named Elias: "@Only_James. All this sounds good from the perspective of scientists and economists. But what about ordinary people? If sor energy does repce conventional energy, what impact will it have on employment?"

  Only James: "@Elias. It depends on the sector and country. In the short term, certain jobs in the fossil fuel industry will probably be affected. That does not mean absolute job loss, just that some workers will have to transition into other new fields, such as sor-panel manufacturing, smart grid network management, research, and development of new energy technologies. It always hasn't been easy; nevertheless, in their existence, new industries have always generated new work needs."

  User named Sylvia: "That is if the transition goes smoothly. But what about those in regions who have looked to conventional energy as their lifeline? Will they be left hanging?"

  User named Hector: "@Sylvia. That is why the government has to py a serious role. There needs to be a compensatory strategy in pce to ensure these communities do not face difficulties in economies dependent on aging industries. It is not just about science or economics; it is about social justice."

  In all this, @Only_James remained aloof. He didn't talk much and pumped no air into the discussion.

  Sometimes he corrects, sometimes he nods in agreement, sometimes he just observes how the debate develops without needing to intervene.